Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's voice actor F stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote in the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten foot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between fiction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in attempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with very modest amounts of cueing.

Hugh Hewitt interview ed Time Magazine Baghdad bureau chief Michael Ware on Tuesday (replaying Thursday). The interview is a stunning example of how moral relativism impairs one's moral intuitions and renders their judgment nonsensical. Ware argues for a journalistic objectivity that requires moral neutrality, thus he can't discern or won't admit to a moral difference between the Iraqi and Coalition troops and the terrorists blowing up innocent Iraqis. They are just two sides of a war he must report on. Ware has spent time with the terrorists and written about their perspective with the lack of value judgment he deems necessary to journalism. It's only required to represent another point of view. In one segment of the interview, Hugh asked Ware a hypothetical question, which Ware apparently had no moral apparatus to understand. Hugh asked him whether if he'd been a reporter in World War 2, would he have reported Hitler's side of the war with the neutrality he reports on the terrorists. Ware, seemingly genuine, took the question as a logistical one, not a moral one. He said that it was impossible to compare the two wars since there was a clear front line between the Allies and Hitler that prevented die cut handle bags eporters from crossing over and no such line prevents reporters from reaching the terrorists in Iraq.

Jackie Calmes writes: "Hamiltonian Democrats" Get New Leader : Former Clinton administration economist Jason Furman will become the new director of The Hamilton Project, a year-old effort of the Brookings Institution to promote a centrist economic strategy. Named for Alexander Hamilton, the nation's first Treasury secretary, the project is better known for its association with his modern successor, Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, a founder and funder. Peter Orszag, the project's founding director a year ago, is leaving to become the director of the Congressional Budget disney wonder cruise ship ffice when Democrats take control of Congress in January. Both Orszag and Furman are veterans of the Clinton administration economic team and proteges of Rubin, now a director of Citigroup Inc. Both have been leading Democratic voices lately in the policy debates over taxes, Social Security, health programs and other fiscal issues. With protectionist pressures growing amid manufacturing job losses, the Hamilton Project has emerged as an intellectual counterweight to organized labor and liberal groups that want to restrict trade, and a source of policy fodder for potential Democratic presidential candidates, including Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. Despite the "Hamiltonians'" differences over trade with more liberal Democrats, its policy prescriptions for adjusting to the pain of globalization have much for liberals to agree with.

From Crikey : "Our friends at Media Monitors tell us that since 1 March there have been 15,028 mentions of John Howard, 8247 of Kevin Rudd and 380 of McKew." freeware internet eraser

Hugh Hewitt interview ed Time Magazine Baghdad bureau chief Michael Ware on Tuesday (replaying Thursday). The interview is a stunning example of how moral relativism impairs one's chlorine dioxide generator oral intuitions and renders their judgment nonsensical. Ware argues for a journalistic objectivity that requires moral neutrality, thus he can't discern or won't admit to a moral difference between the Iraqi and Coalition troops and the terrorists blowing up innocent Iraqis. They are just two sides of a war he must report on. Ware has spent time with the terrorists and written about their perspective with the lack of value judgment he deems necessary to journalism. It's only required to represent another point of view. In one segment of the interview, Hugh asked Ware a hypothetical question, which Ware apparently had no moral apparatus to understand. Hugh asked him whether if he'd been a reporter in World War 2, would he have reported Hitler's side of the war with the neutrality he reports on the terrorists. Ware, seemingly genuine, took the question as a logistical one, not a moral one. He said that it was impossible to compare the two wars since there was a clear front line between the Allies and Hitler that prevented reporters from crossing over and no such line prevents reporters from reaching the terrorists in Iraq.

Hugh Hewitt interview ed Time Magazine Baghdad bureau chief Michael Ware on Tuesday (replaying Thursday). The interview is a stunning example of how moral relativism impairs one's moral intuitions and renders their judgment nonsensical. Ware argues for a journalistic objectivity that requires moral neutrality, thus he can't discern or won't admit to a moral difference between the Iraqi and Coalition troops and the terrorists blowing up innocent Iraqis. They are just two sides of a war he must report on. Ware has spent time with the terrorists old testament introduction nd written about their perspective with the lack of value judgment he deems necessary to journalism. It's only required to represent another point of view. In one segment of the interview, Hugh asked Ware a hypothetical question, which Ware apparently had no moral apparatus to understand. Hugh asked him whether if he'd been a reporter in World War 2, would he have reported Hitler's side of the war with the neutrality he reports on the terrorists. Ware, seemingly genuine, took the question as a logistical one, not a moral one. He said that it was impossible to compare the two wars since there was a clear front line between the Allies and Hitler that prevented reporters from crossing over and no such line prevents reporters from reaching the terrorists in Iraq.

Aerospace Engineer - Booz Allen Hamilton US-OH-Dayton hypersonic strike vehicles. Apply a strong background in aerospace and understanding ... experience with high-speed aerospace, online leads articularly hypersonics -3-5 years of From: Booz Allen Hamilton

Hugh Hewitt interview ed Time Magazine Baghdad bureau chief Michael Ware on Tuesday (replaying Thursday). The interview is a stunning example of how moral relativism impairs one's moral intuitions and renders their judgment nonsensical. Ware argues for a journalistic objectivity that requires moral neutrality, thus he can't discern or won't admit to a moral difference between the Iraqi and Coalition troops and the terrorists blowing up innocent Iraqis. They are just two sides of a war he must report on. Ware has spent time with the terrorists and written about their perspective with the lack of value judgment he deems necessary to journalism. It's only required to represent another point of view. In one segment of the interview, Hugh asked Ware a hypothetical question, which Ware apparently had no moral apparatus to understand. Hugh asked him whether if he'd non profit programs een a reporter in World War 2, would he have reported Hitler's side of the war with the neutrality he reports on the terrorists. Ware, seemingly genuine, took the question as a logistical one, not a moral one. He said that it was impossible to compare the two wars since there was a clear front line between the Allies and Hitler that prevented reporters from crossing over and no such line prevents reporters from reaching the terrorists in Iraq.

Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's SF stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote in the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten foot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between fiction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in cash register paper ttempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with very modest amounts of cueing.

Aerospace Engineer - Booz Allen Hamilton US-OH-Dayton hypersonic strike isaac asimov robot ehicles. Apply a strong background in aerospace and understanding ... experience with high-speed aerospace, particularly hypersonics -3-5 years of From: Booz Allen Hamilton

Via the Blogfather, a well-written piece in the WaPo tells the story of our battlebots and the troops who work with them. It sounds rather familiar to anyone who grew up on Keith Laumer's SF stories of the Bolos , gigantic autonomous battle tanks of the future. Laumer wrote in the 60s, when the images of WWII armor battles still lingered, when counterinsurgency and asymmetric warfare were still minor military specialties, and before the miniaturizing effects of Moore's Law had really kicked in. A real 21st century PackBot would be dust under the ten foot wide treads of a Bolo Mark XXVIII. What's in common between fiction and fact is the tendency of the warriors to give names, ranks and even decorations to the bots, and go well beyond the call of duty in attempting to preserve and repair them. Perhaps unsurprising given the tendency of teamwork under stress to create strong relationships- and a phenomenon fairly well know in the literature. Back in the day... (flashback dissolve) I and a team of folks at Apple showed that you could get people to attribute human emotions to a 32x32 pixel black and white icon fronting for a simple database algorithm ( skip to 'Guides' heading here ). Then a couple of Stanford profs systematically showed just how simple it is to get someone to project human motivations and social roles onto computing or communications devices, with share ware music ery modest amounts of cueing.

Click Here

Aerospace Engineer - Booz Allen Hamilton US-OH-Dayton hypersonic strike vehicles. Apply a strong background in aerospace and understanding ... experience with high-speed aerospace, particularly hypersonics -3-5 wachovia bank branches ears of From: Booz Allen Hamilton